Rosnah Shirlin bidas Anwar Ibrahim berkaitan kenyataan Anwar mengenai Arab Springs

Rosnah Shirlin


Anwar Ibrahim, jika dia dilahirkan di Sudan, Afrika, pasti Malaysia tidak huru hara dikerjakan olehnya. Bongok punya Anwar, kemaruk sangat nak jadi PM sehingga nak huru harakan negara. Brengsek. Kenapa Anwar Ibrahim tak dilahirkan di Sudan atau Swaziland atau Lesotho atau di Congo, Afrika. Bila itu berlaku, maka yang huru hara ialah Afrika, bukan Malaysia. Memang Anwar Ibrahim dilahirkan di Malaysia? INi hanya merosakkan Malaysia. Damnnnnnnnnnnnn...


KENYATAAN MEDIA YB DATUK ROSNAH ABDUL RASHID SHIRLIN, KETUA PERGERAKAN PUTERI UMNO MALAYSIA MENGENAI AMARAN TUN MAHATHIR BERKENAAN DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM SERTA ANCAMAN ARAB SPRING

Perancangan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengimport demonstrasi jalanan ala 'Arab Spring' mampu menghancurkan keamanan serta kestabilan negara. Ancaman Datuk Seri Anwar ini hanyalah sekadar alasan bagi merealisasikan hasrat beliau untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri. Saya amat bersetuju dengan amaran serta nasihat Mantan Perdana Menteri Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad haruslah dipandang secara serius.

Pihak Pembangkang memberikan alasan bahawa system serta pelaksanaan pilihan raya di negara ini tidak bersih sedangkan Datuk Seri Anwar sendiri tahu bahawa YAB Perdana Menteri kita yang tersayang serta Kerajaan Barisan Nasional sentiasa memastikan bahawa pilihan raya di negara dijalankan dengan telus dan bersih. Ini terbuktinya dengan pihak pembangkang dapat memenangi kerusi-kerusi di Parlimen selain mengambil alih beberapa negeri pada Pilihan Raya Umum yang lalu. Sekiranya Kerajaan Barisan Nasional tidak adil atau tidak bersih bagaimana Barisan Nasional (BN) membiarkan kegagalan majoriti dua pertiga pada Pilihan Raya Umum yang lalu? (Fakta ini sudah disebut beribu ribu kali tetapi si dangkal Anwar Ibrahim tak pernah faham faham.. Bongok)

Datuk Seri Anwar tahu kerosakan yang akan dibawanya terhadap ekonomi negara dengan demonstrasi besar-besaran itu. Rakyat mungkin dipujuk mengundi partinya untuk mengelak derita ekonomi yang disebabkan demonstrasi tersebut. Adakah ini demokrasi? Ini sudah tentu menyedihkan bagi Malaysia jika bentuk 'ugutan' itu digunakan bagi memenangi pilihan raya.

Adakah pemimpin sebegini yang diperlukan oleh rakyat? Seorang yang sanggup menjaja negara serta menggadaikan keamanan negara semata-mata hendak mencapai matlamat pihak pembangkang? Pihak pembangkang yang sentiasa berjuang berdasarkan fitnah dan tuduhan tanpa mengira kesan daripada ancaman serta fitnah mereka.

Sekiranya, ‘Arab Spring’ perlu dijadikan contoh teladan seperti kata Datuk Seri Anwar,maka satu-satunya yang boleh diteladani ialah agar tidak mengikut jejak langkah negara Arab dengan menjatuhkan kerajaan melalui pemberontakan. Sekiranya Datuk Seri Anwar ingin sangat menjadi Perdana Menteri, beliau perlu melalui cara demokrasi sebenar,iaitu pilihanraya.

Tidak ada seorang pun dari rakyat Malaysia yang wajar kehilangan pekerjaan,kerugian perniagaan,menderita atau bergadai nyawa untuk memastikan Datuk Seri Anwar dan pihak pembangkang mencapai cita-citanya.Kita tidak perlu menggadaikan nikmat yang sedia ada dan mereka yang terlibat dalam ‘Arab Spring’ di negara Arab pasti akan memberitahu kita bahawa apa yang kita nikmati hari ini adalah tidak ternilai harganya.

Hidup Malaysia. Pergi Mampus Anwar Ibrahim. Get Lost Anwar Ibrahim. You sucks

Anwar Ibrahim memilih jalan sukar untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia

Anwar Ibrahim berada di Tuaran, Sabah pada Ahad 29 Julai 2012 bersama sama 2 pemimpin BN Sabah yang baru meninggalkan BN dalam tempoh 24 jam lalu iaitu Timbalan Presiden UPKO dan Ahli Parlimen Tuaran, Datuk Wilfred Bumburing (kiri) dan Janang Gayuh merangkap Ahli Parlimen Beaufort, Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin (kanan).

Pada 1993 hingga Ogos 1998 Anwar Ibrahim adalah Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia dan Perdana Menteri ketika itu Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad sudah menamakan Anwar sebagai penggantinya.

Ketika itu bola emas dan emas sudah ada ditangan Anwar tapi dia memilih jalan sukar untuk menjadi PM.

Ini umpama hanya perlu menendang bola ke dalam gol yang terbuka luas tanpa penjaga gol seperti dalam bolasepak, Anwar hanya perlu menyepak bola itu masuk dari jarak 1 kaki.



Namun dia memilih jalan sukar menjadi PM. Anwar memilih untuk mengelecek bola itu dari kawasannya sendiri dan mengelecek 10 pertahanan lawan sebelum cuba menjaringkan gol. Namun gol yang ditunggu tunggu itu tidak tiba dan tidak pernah tiba dan tidak akan tiba.


Anwar memang pandai bercakap ketika berucap, namun tidak semua apa yang diungkapkannya itu benar dan boleh dipercayai 100%.

Anwar akhirnya menubuhkan PKR, dan pernah disumbat ke dalam penjara, mengadakan rusuhan dan kacau bilau di jalanan menerusi gerakan Reformasi serta demmonstrasi haram jalanan Bersih 1.0, 2.0 dan 3.0, sekaligus mencetus dan menimbulkan pelbagai imej negatif untuk Malaysia di mata dunia.

Akibat Anwarlah, kita melihat ada gas pemedih mata dan meriam air terpaksa dilepaskan polis anti rusuhan di jalanan di Malaysia. Sebelum Anwar buat hal, kita tidak melihat gas pemedih mata dan meriam air digunakan untuk menyuraikan perusuh di Malaysia kecuali mungkin ketika tragedi 13 May 1969 atau tragedi Memali.


Adakah Anwar mampu menjadikan Malaysia lebih baik jika dia menjadi PM? Setahu saya Anwar tidak pandai mengurus kewangan negara ketika menjadi menteri Kewangan dalam kabinet Mahathir.

Ketika itu Malaysia dan negara lain dunia berdepan krisis kegawatan ekonomi yang menyebabkan ekonomi merudum dan matawang Ringgit menyusut teruk berbanding dolar Amerika.

Akhirnya Mahathir menyelamatkan Malaysia apabila menetapkan 1 ringgit dengan 2.80 dolar amerika.

Anwar pula mahu meminjam dari Tabung Matawang Antarabangsa, IMF, satu tindakan gampang yang menyebabkan Indonesia dan Thailand lebih teruk keadaannya selepas meminjam dari IMF.

Suharto digulingkan selaku presiden Indonesia dan digantikan BJ Habibie setelah rusuhan teruk di Jakarta yang menyebabkan ramai etnik Cina Indonesia, mati dibunuh kejam gara gara ekonomi makin gawat setelah Indonesia meminjam dari IMF.

Itu baru aspek kewangan, belum lagi aspek lain mengenai Anwar.

Pemimpin beginikah yang kita mahu sebagai PM Malaysia?

Tepuk dada tanya selera...

Gambar Datuk Wilfred Bumburing keluar BN bersama Anwar Ibrahim di Tuaran, 29 July 2012

Timbalan presiden parti UPKO dan Ahli Parlimen Tuaran, Datuk Wilfred Mojilip Bumburing hari ini 29 julai 2012 umum keluar BN dan mewujudkan Angkatan perubahan Sabah, APS yang membantu pembangkang dalam pilihanraya umum ke 13 kelak.

Bumburing pemimpin BN Sabah kedua yang keluar BN dalam tempoh 24 jam lalu selepas Ahli Parlimen Beaufort, Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin.

Pengumuman dibuat di Tuaran dengan diharidi Lajim Ukin dan beberapa pemimpin pembangkang termasuk Anwar Ibrahim dan Tian Chua.

Antara sebab Bumburing keluar BN kerana melihat kerajaan Pusat tidak bersungguh sungguh menangani masalah pendatang tanpa izin di Sabah.

Puteri UMNO cabar Anwar Ibrahim buktikan undang undang sodomi/liwat sudah lapuk dan tidak relevan di Malaysia yang agama rasminya Islam

KENYATAAN AKHBAR YB DATUK ROSNAH ABDUL RASHID SHIRLIN KETUA PERGERAKAN PUTERI UMNO MALAYSIA - 18 Januari 2012

Pergerakan Puteri UMNO mencabar Ketua Pembangkang, Anwar Ibrahim membuktikan
bagaimana undang-undang sodomi itu boleh dikatakan lapuk dan tidak relevan terutamanya di Malaysia yang agama rasminya Islam. Anwar juga dicabar supaya membuktikan bahawa kenyataannya itu bukan bertujuan menyokong amalan gay baik di Malaysia mahu pun di negara-negara lain di dunia.

Undang-undang jenayah jelas menyenaraikan liwat atau sodomi sebagai satu jenayah dan boleh dihukum sehingga 20 tahun penjara, dan ia bukan diguna pakai di Malaysia sahaja sebaliknya negara-negara lain turut menguatkuasakan undang-undang tersebut.

Kenyataan Anwar itu hakikatnya amat mengaibkan umat Islam apatah lagi diucapkan oleh seorang pemimpin yang sentiasa dijulang kononnya berimejkan Islam malah baru-baru ini disifatkan sebagai pemimpin yang bakal menyatukan dunia Islam.

Begitukah rupanya pemimpin yang layak menyatukan dunia Islam sedangkan dia sendiri sanggup menghalalkan apa yang terang-terangan diharamkan agama. Jika orang Islam sendiri mengatakan undang-undang sodomi itu sudah lapuk, apa hukumnya dari sudut kaca mata Islam? 

Pergerakan Puteri UMNO juga mencabar rakan-rakan Anwar yang terdiri daripada ulama besar di dalam Pas seperti Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang dan Datuk Seri Nik Aziz Nik Mat supaya menyatakan pendirian mereka tentang kenyataan Anwar itu. Malah barisan kepimpinan Pas juga mesti menyatakan pendirian mereka tentang amalan gay yang semakin berleluasa di negara ini sama ada mereka merestui perbuatan tersebut atau sebaliknya. 

Pemimpin Pas tidak boleh berdiam diri seperti mana sekarang ini kerana dengan berdiam diri mereka boleh saja dianggap bersetuju dengan kenyataan Anwar sekali gus menyokong amalan seks songsang. Pergerakan Puteri UMNO semakin bimbang dengan cubaan secara terang-terangan Anwar Ibrahim menyokong amalan songsang seks sejenis yang pastinya dialu-alukan oleh golongan gay di negara ini.

Pertanyaan Puteri kepada Anwar adakah kenyataannya tentang undang-undang sodomi yang dikatakan lapuk itu bertujuan meraih sokongan golongan gay yang semakin bercambah sekarang ini? Dan adakah beliau juga mahu menghalalkan amalan seks songsang di kalangan masyarakat di Malaysia sehingga undang-undang yang berkaitan dengan amalan itu dikatakan lapuk?

Yang Ikhlas,

YB Datuk Rosnah Binti Haji Abd Rashid Shirlin
( Ketua Pergerakan Puteri UMNO Malaysia )

Kerajaan BN memang prihatin kepada rakyat Sabah

Selasa lalu, 17 Januari 2012, Timbalan Perdana Menteri YAB Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin turun padang ke Semporna, di pantai Timur Sabah untuk program agihan bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia atau BR1M selain program pemimpin bersama rakyat dan perjumpaan bersama penjawat awam. Ini lawatan pertama Muhyiddin ke Semporna sejak dilantik Timbalan Perdana Menteri pada 2009.



Dan keceriaan jelas terpancar di wajah pakcik ini setelah menerima RM500 BR1M daripada Muhyiddin sendiri di padang pekan Semporna. Untuk rekod, pakcik ini tidak boleh berjalan dan terpaksa didukung anak lelakinya dan terpaksa menaiki bot dari Pulau Larapan untuk ke Semporna bagi menerima bantuan RM500 ini, pastinya amat bermakna kepada beliau. Ringanlah beban beliau dan murahlah rezeki kepada mereka yang memberikan bantuan ini.






Pada majlis ini, Muhyiddin memberitahu bahawa pemberian BR1M adalah praktikal dan boleh dilaksanakan kerajaan meskipun ada 4 juta penerima dan kosnya kira kira 2 billion ringgit.

Bukan sahaja rakyat menerima BR1M berupa RM500 seorang, malahan pelajar sekolah juga mendapat bantuan RM100 seorang ketika awal musim persekolahan dan pelajar Tingkatan 6 pula menerima baucar pendidikan RM200 seorang.

Subsidi 22 billion ringgit tahunan pula disalurkan kerajaan untuk memastikan rakyat tidak perlu membayar harga tinggi bagi membeli barangan keperluan seharian.

Ini berbeza dengan pembangkang yang menjanjikan bulan dan bintang (atau roket) tetapi mustahil dilaksanakan seperti janji menghapuskan Tol dan Pinjaman Tabung Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional, PTPTN, yang sememangnya dan semestinya tidak praktikal.

Kalau nak hapuskan tol, siapa nak bayar kos 10 billion ringgit yang dibelanjakan syarikat pembina lebuhraya itu? Siapa? Anwar Ibrahim? Lim Kit Siang? Karpal Singh? Azmin Ali? Semestinya bukan dan tidak!!!



Gambar ini menunjukkan wajah ceria dan gembira seramai 37 golongan kurang berkemampuan termasuk warga emas, ibu tunggal dan orang kelainan upaya (O-K-U) menerima sumbangan sempena Tahun Baru Cina di DUN Tanjung Batu dalam kawasan Parlimen Kalabakan, di Sabah.

Sumbangan barangan keperluan asas seperti minyak masak, tepung, gula,
limau mandarin serta 'ang pau' itu disampaikah ADUN Tanjung Batu, Datuk Hamisa Samat di Pusat Khidmat Wakil Rakyat Dun Tanjung Batu, Tawau, baru baru ini.

Menurut Hamisa, sumbangan itu bertujuan meringankan beban kaum
Tionghua sempena Tahun Baru Cina supaya mereka dapat menyambutnya
dalam keadaan gembira dan selesa.

"Diharap sumbangan ini membolehkan mereka membuat persediaan awal
sempena sambutan Tahun baru Cina ini," katanya selepas majlis
penyampaian sumbangan itu.

Nah, inilah keprihatinan kerajaan BN untuk rakyat Sabah.

Untuk rekod, BN Sabah mencatat kejayaan cemerlang apabila menang 59 daripada 60 kerusi DUN Sabah dan 24 daripada 25 kerusi Parlimen pada pilihanraya umum 2004 dan 2008.

Sekaligus digelar Fixed Deposit.

Lantaran tsunami politik di Semenanjung, Anwar Ibrahim dan kroninya terdesak untuk mendambakan sokongan pengundi Sabah dan Sarawak kerana dia kemaruk mahu menjadi Perdana Menteri.

Sebenarnya Anwar Ibrahim ada jalan mudah untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri pada 1993 apabila dia menang perebutan jawatan Timbalan presiden UMNO ketika menentang Timbalan Presiden ketika itu, Allahyarham Tun Ghafar Baba.

Ketika itu Anwar Ibrahim mendapat tendangan penalti dan dia hanya perlu menendang bola ke dalam gawang gol. Namun Anwar Ibrahim memilih untuk menendang bola itu dari kawasannya sendiri dan mengelecek beberapa pertahanan lawan sebelum cuba merembat bola, namun bola itu tersasar, tidak gol.

Anwar tidak cerdik menutup kelemahannya, dituduh seorang gay dan homoseksual sehingga dibenci dan dipecat oleh Tun Mahathir Mohamad. Anwar memilih jalan sukar untuk menjadi PM.

Oleh itu rakyat Sabah, ingatlah, pilihlah permata, bukannya kaca, negara bukan sahaja bakal bengkrap apabila ditadbir Anwar kerana dulu dia selaku Menteri Kewangan Malaysia mahu meminjam daripada Tabung Matawang Antarabangsa, IMF ketika dunia dilanda krisis ekonomi dan kegawatan kewangan global.

Indonesia meminjam dari IMF dan huru hara berlaku, rusuhan berlaku, bunuh membunuh berlaku dan Suahrto dipaksa letak jawatan sebagai Presiden.

Thailand juga begitu, porak peranda.

Nasib baik Malaysia dan Tun Mahathir tidak mengikut telunjuk dan cadangan Anwar untuk pinjam dari IMF, jika tidak binasa kita.

Orang macam ini kah yang kita mahu untuk mentadbir Malaysia?

Jawapannya tidak, sama sekali tidak.....

Malaysian Opposition Leader, Anwar Ibrahim acquitted of Sodomy charges, his accusser accepts court's decision

To me, this verdict does not mean that anybody can sodomise anyone against their will in Malaysia.

Some accused for example in the USA have been jailed for 38 years and then released after recent DNA tests concluded that they are not guilty as in the case of James Bain, convicted for raping a 9 year old boy in 1974 but released in 2009 after DNA tests scientifically and successfully proved that he didn't commit the crime.

And in the case of Mr Bain, he is guilty in the eyes of the public but in fact he is innocent. This shows that the real criminal/perpetrator is still out there, scot free, free to commit another heinous crimes, the real perpetrator in Mr Bain's case is guilty but he is seen as innocent by the public because the public doesn't know. So In the latest case that grip Malaysia today, if you are found guilty by the court does not mean that you are really guilty and if you are found not guilty by the court does not mean you are innocent.

The case that grip Malaysia today on Monday 9th January 2012 is this :

Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has been acquitted of sodomy after a two-year trial.

Kuala Lumpur High Court Judge Zabidin Mohamad Diah said DNA evidence submitted by the prosecution was unreliable and discharged the case.

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has been acquitted by the High Court on a charge of sodomising his former personal aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah said the court could not be 100% certain after going through the evidence that the integrity of the DNA samples had not been compromised.

“The court finds that it is not safe to rely on the DNA evidence. So what is left is only Mohd Saiful testimony, ” he said in his oral judgement.

“As this is a sexual crime, the court is reluctant to convict based entirely on Mohd Saiful's testimony without corroboration. The accused is thus acquitted and discharged,” he ruled.

The judgment, read in less than two minutes, was delivered to a packed courtroom that then erupted into cheers and shouts of Allahuakbar (God is great).

Anwar, 64, has consistently denied the charges and called them a government bid to cripple his political ambitions and influence.

However, Anwar is also reluctant to declare his innocence by taking oath inside a Mosque, as had been done bravely by Mohd Saiful.

Anwar's reluctance, made him guilty in the eyes of Malaysians.


This is Saiful's sworn statement that he was indeed sodomised by Anwar Ibahim. Saiful made this sworn statement inside a mosque and holding a Quran on August 2008. Despite being challenged to do so, Anwar was reluctant. So to me Anwar did indeed sodomised Saiful, unless Anwar gives a sworn statement like this.

The government said the verdict showed Malaysia's judiciary was free from government influence.

Sodomy is illegal in Muslim-majority Malaysia but very few people are ever prosecuted.

'Justice has prevailed'

Mr Anwar had been accused of having sex with a former male aide. He had faced up to 20 years in prison if found guilty.

Meanwhile The United States Department said the court ruling reflected favourably on the independence of Malaysia's judiciary.

"We welcome the closure of this long-running case, which we've followed closely," said a statement from the office of the department's spokesman, issued through the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur.

It said the ruling presented an opportunity for all Malaysians to focus on the future.

In SINGAPORE, Catherine Ashton, the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the Commission, hailed the integrity of Malaysia's judiciary system in light of its verdict on Anwar.

Her views was sent through a statement issued by a spokesperson from the EU's headquarters in Brussels.

The statement read:

"The High Representative welcomes the fact that Anwar Ibrahim has been acquitted. This verdict shows the integrity of Malaysia's judicial system, which is an essential pillar in a democratic system. The High Representative hopes that the matter will now be put to rest."

Saiful accepts court's decision, hopes prosecution will appeal

Meanwhile Anwar's accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan hopes the prosecution would lodge an appeal against the High Court's decision to acquit Anwar for sodomising him.

In a latest entry in his blog, Mohd Saiful tweeted that he accepted the verdict with a calm heart but said that he too has the right to recourse.

"My family and I, therefore, hope that the prosecution could take up the case to the Court of Appeal," he said. "As a servant of Allah, I believe there is a blessing in disguise in everything," he said, expressing his gratitude to all who have supported and prayed for him.

To me, this verdict does not mean that anybody can sodomise anyone against their will in Malaysia.

Jika Hukum Hudud dilaksana, adakah Anwar Ibrahim akan didakwa mengikut Hudud??

Dewasa ini banyak debat di media dan alam siber mengenai kewajaran pelaksanaan hukum Hudud di negara ini.

Namun jika hukum Hudud dilaksanakan, adakah individu pertama yang bakal dikenakan tindakan mengikut Hukum Hudud ialah individu di atas?

Bukti bergambar dia melakukan seks dengan seorang wanita Cina sudah ditayangkan dan disebarkan di internet.

Jadi adakah lelaki berkenaan yang dikatakan mirip dan menyerupai ketua Pembangkang, Anwar Ibrahim, akan turut dikenakan tindakan mengikut Hukum Hudud??

Malahan Anwar juga ketika ini sedang berdepan tuduhan meliwat seorang lelaki, Saiful Bukhari Azlan.



Beberapa parti politik dan pemimpinnya seperti Mursyidul Am PAS merangkap Menteri Besar Kelantan, Tuan Guru Dato Nik Aziz Nik Mat (gambar atas), antara yang menyokong penuh pelaksanaan hukum Hudud di Malaysia.

Malahan pada 2 November 2011 lalu, Mesyuarat Exco kerajaan Pas Kelantan, mengesahkan pelantikan 20 ahli Jawatankuasa Teknikal Hudud yang akan dimaklumkan dengan surat pelantikan masing-masing dalam masa terdekat.

Jawatankuasa itu dianggotai 19 ahli dalam kalangan profesionaldan sekiranya perlu keahlian mungkin ditambah.

Peranan jawatankuasa berkenaan antara lain mengkaji kemungkinan pelaksanaan enakmen itu berikutan wujud pandangan mengatakan ia boleh dilaksanakan tanpa perlu meminda perlembagaan dan undang-undang sedia ada.

Tips mengelak rakaman aksi seks di bilik Hotel

Video di atas diperolehi dari rakaman tersembunyi kamera yang disorokkan dekat meja di sebuah bilik Hotel di Kuala Lumpur yang kononnya melibatkan aksi seks Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan seorang wanita Cina yang sememangnya seksi.

Kamera video ini terdiri daripada pelbagai versi, model dan jenis.



Fungsi setiap kamera video adalah sama, merakamkan visual dihadapan lensanya.

Namun musuh kamera hanya ada 2 iaitu air dan lampu/cahaya.



Jika terkena air, kamera akan rosak, kecuali kamera di dasar laut yang mempunyai kelengkapan pelindung khas.

Dan jika terdedah kepada cahaya yang terlalu kuat, maka imej yang dirakam menjadi over-exposed atau "burn" atau rosak.

Dan jika tidak cukup cahaya, visual yang dirakam pasti tak kelihatan dan tak jelas langsung.

Nah, jika anda dan pasangan anda tidak mahu aksi anda di ranjang bilik hotel menjadi tontonan seantero dunia di Youtube atau Internet, maka malapkanlah lampu.

Mana tahu, rakan anda mahu sabotaj anda ataupun ada pihak mahu menganiaya dan menjatuhkan anda kan?

Kamera secanggih manapun pasti tidak dapat merakamkan imej dengan jelas jika tidak mempunyai sumber pencahayaan yang cukup, seperti contoh imej dibawah :







Jika kamera itu canggih sekalipun seperti mempunyai ciri Infrared, maka imej/visual yang dirakamkan, tetap tidak jelas dan mengaburi identiti sebenar individu dalam rakaman itu, sepertimana imej Infrared di atas.

Tapi ingat, tips ini bukan mengalakkan anda semua melakukan maksiat yaa....

Sebaik baiknya, bagi pasangan yang sudah kahwin, maka nikmati hubungan suami isteri anda di ranjang rumah, itupun periksa dulu, mana tahu ada tangan tangan nakal yang mahu berkongsi saat saat intim anda dengan dunia luar.

Terima kasih kerana membaca...

Malaysian Sodomy Trial: Anwar Ibrahim denies he had sexual relations with Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan

Anwar Ibrahim


Saiful Bukhari Azlan


Anwar Ibrahim (middle) in 1984 with Najib Razak (right) and Musa Hitam (left)

In the High Court in Kuala Lumpur today, Monday 22nd August 2011, Malaysian opposition leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has denied he had any sexual relations with his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

"I state, in no uncertain terms, that I have never had any sexual relations with the complainant, Mohd Saiful.

"Saiful's allegation is a blatant and vicious lie and will be proved to be so," he told the High Court.

Anwar was opting to give his evidence from the dock, as his defence on the charge of sodomising Mohd Saiful began today, Monday 22nd August 2011.

The Opposition leader, in his statement, started off with his experience in his 1998 sodomy trial, in which he was convicted and jailed, and categorically denied the charge against him.

Anwar added that the circumstances were compelling that he elected to make a statement from the dock.

He claimed he has been deprived of a level playing field and subjected to inequality of arms vis-a-vis the prosecution.

Anwar, 63, had pleaded not guilty to committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature on Mohd Saiful at Desa Damansara Condominium in Bukit Damansara between 3.10pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

On May 16, 2011 Mohd Zabidin ordered Anwar to enter his defence after ruling that the Opposition leader's former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, the complainant in the case, was a truthful and credible witness.

Anwar Ibrahim's STATEMENT FROM THE DOCK

My name is Anwar bin Ibrahim. I am the leader of the Opposition in Parliament. In the 1990s, I was the Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister until September 1998 when then Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad sacked me after I had refused to resign. He had told me to resign or face dire consequences including criminal prosecution for alleged sexual and corruption offences. I refused and all hell broke loose. My unceremonious and grossly unjust dismissal simultaneously orchestrated with a trial by media under Mahathir’s complete control triggered mass and widespread demonstrations throughout the country and launched the movement for change and reform known in our history as the Reformasi era.

After a series of show trials during which every rule in the book on evidence and criminal procedure was violated with impunity at the hands of the prosecution and the courts, I was convicted and sentenced to a total of 15 years. He finished reading his 32-page statement to the court at 11.47am.

Anwar's statement THE CHARGE AGAINST ME

First and foremost, I categorically deny the charge against me. I want to state in no uncertain terms that I have never had any sexual relations with the complainant Mohamed Saiful. His allegation is a blatant and vicious lie and will be proved to be so.

This is a vile and despicable attempt at character assassination. In this regard, let me reiterate that they can do all they want to assassinate my character and sully my reputation and threaten me with another 20 years of imprisonment but mark my words, they won’t be able to cow me into submission. On the contrary, it only serves to fortify my conviction that the truth will eventually prevail. Come what come may, I shall never surrender.

Anwar's statement > THE COMPLAINANT’S ALLEGATIONS ARE PURE FABRICATION

As I have said at the outset, I categorically deny the allegations made against me by the complainant.

The complainant stated in evidence on 26th June, 2008 he arrived at Kondominium Desa Damansara at 2.45 p.m. to discuss work matters and hand-over documents given to him by one Ibrahim Yaakob [my Chief of Staff] to myself. He says he stopped his van at the security post and mentioned the code name ‘Mokhtar’ to the guards at the condominium before being allowed in. He parked his vehicle and took the lift to Unit 11-5-1 where I was allegedly seated at a dining table in the living room. He says he sat down at the same table and started the discussion. He told the court of the crude manner in which I had allegedly asked for sex.

The following appears in his evidence thereafter (as attached).

When questioned, he answered that he was angry and scared and that he was not prepared to do it but purportedly because I had appeared angry, he eventually obliged. It has to be observed at this stage the complainant could have, on his own admission in examination-in-chief, left the room as there is no evidence of any attempt by me to latch the door from inside.

He had further alleged that he was ordered into the bedroom and that he did enter out of fear. Even at this stage, the complainant had the opportunity to leave the living room. He did not do so. The rest of the evidence in this regard clearly showed that the complainant had every opportunity on every occasion to flee but he did not do so. His reason was that he was petrified by fear. But such a reason flies against the facts. Here is a man in his early twenties, a six-footer, physically fit and robust and with powerful connections in the top police brass as well as the political elite with access to the very inner sanctum of power. Additionally, he has also been a key UMNO student operative, having undergone the rigorous training conducted by the Biro Tats Negara of the Prime Minister’s Department. And here I was a 60-year-old man with a history of back injury who had undergone a major back surgery holding no position of power. If indeed I could have exercised any kind of undue influence or mental pressure on him, this could have been easily neutralized by a quick phone call to his connections. As regards the fear of physical harm, it would take a great stretch of the imagination to suggest that I could pose any physical harm to him.

Under cross-examination, the following significant evidence was elicited from the complainant. He admitted that he had brought along lubricant and had himself voluntarily and without hesitation applied it. He claimed that carnal intercourse took place and that it was painful and coarse. However, this was clearly not borne out in the medical evidence in the prosecution case suggesting fissures or tears. After the alleged act, he testified that he had a drink and engaged in a friendly conversation with me. Startlingly, no attempt was made by the complainant to seek immediate medical attention. Instead, he attended a PKR function the following day. In the evening, he joined a meeting of the Anwar Ibrahim Club at my house without showing any sign of either emotional or physical discomfort let alone trauma. On the contrary, he was going about matters in a calm and confident manner. His conduct therefore is totally inconsistent with having been violated. In any event, he neither made a police report nor sought medical attention, notwithstanding that two days prior to the alleged act, he had met with Najib and Rosmah as well having talked on the phone with Musa Hassan and met with Rodhwan at a hotel.

It is obvious, from the evidence above, that the complainant was lying through his teeth although Y.A., despite the compelling evidence to the contrary, found him a truthful witness at the close of the prosecution case. This defies logic, let alone the law.

Then again, the expert evidence with regard to DNA led in the course of prosecution case through PW4, Dr. Seah Lay Hong and PW5, Nor Aidora bt Saedon was highly questionable in that crucial information pertaining to the DNA analysis of both the said witnesses which they were obliged to furnish to the court was suspiciously withheld despite them confirming the existence of such information. The real possibility that the samples analyzed were contaminated and even planted were completely disregarded despite such possibilities coming clearly within guidelines set by the international forensic community which were completely ignored, if not, blatantly disregarded by PW4 and PW5 to fit the prosecution’s case. It is obvious had the said possibilities been explored, the conclusions reached would have been very different in that the complainant’s own semen was found in his own anus, there was ample evidence of contributors other than Male Y around the complainant’s perianal, lower and higher rectal region and there was clear evidence of the samples having been tampered with before they were sent for analysis. In such circumstances, the integrity of the said samples was surely compromised. Furthermore, the impartiality of PW4 was highly questionable having regard to the way in which she completely dismissed the very high possibility that the samples sent to her would have degraded to a certain degree by the time they reached her which such degradation was completely absent from all samples in this case. This clearly points to the obvious reality that the samples sent for analysis could not have been what were extracted from the complainant’s person.

The court was adjourned to 9 am Tuesday, 23rd August 2011.

Earlier, at the start of the defence proceedings, Anwar's lead counsel Karpal Singh informed the court that his client was going to give evidence from the dock.

High Court judge, Justice Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah, said Anwar had three options - to give his evidence from the witness stand which means he can be cross-examined by the prosecution; to give his evidence from the dock which means he cannot be cross-examined by the prosecution but in coming up with a decision the court takes into account the fact that the prosecution has not cross-examined the accused; or to elect to remain silent.

My Say > From Anwar's statement, does it appears that he was present in that condominium together with Saiful Bukhari on the day of the alleged sodomy act?

Let's wait for the hearings to continue to the end.

Kenyataan pembelaan Anwar Ibrahim di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur, 22 Ogos 2011

Anwar Ibrahim


Saiful Bukhari Azlan


Anwar Ibrahim (tengah) pada 1984 bersama Najib Razak (kanan) dan Musa Hitam (kiri)

Artikel dibawah dipetik dari Keadilan Daily dan Blog Anwar Ibrahim, berkenaan proses perbicaraan kes liwatnya di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur bermula hari ini Isnin 22 Ogos 2011.

Perbicaraan kes liwat peringkat bela diri bermula dengan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim selaku saksi pertama pembelaan memilih untuk memberi keterangan dari kandang tertuduh.

Anwar, 64, dibicarakan setelah mengaku tidak bersalah meliwat Mohd. Saiful Bukhari, 26, di unit 11-5-1, Kondominium Desa Damansara, No. 99, Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara antara pukul 3.01 petang dan 4.30 petang, pada 26 Jun 2008.


Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengemukakan bukti bahawa tuduhan pengadu Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan terhadapnya, adalah palsu dan berniat jahat.

Anwar berkata Saiful merupakan seorang lelaki berusia awal 20-an dengan berketinggian “enam kaki” dan mantap secara fizikal, mempunyai hubungan dengan ahli-ahli politik dan pegawai kanan polis.

Malah katanya, Saiful juga bekas pelajar yang mempunyai hubungan dengan Umno dan menyertai pelbagai latihan kendalian Biro Tata Negara, agensi di bawah Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

“Dan di sini, saya seorang lelaki berusia 60 tahun dengan ada sejarah sakit belakang, yang telah menjalani pembedahan besar dan tidak memiliki sebarang kuasa.

“Jika saya telah menggunakan sebarang bentuk pengaruh atau tekanan mental ke atas dia, ini boleh dengan mudah dineutralkan dengan membuat satu panggilan segera kepada pihak-pihak yang ada hubungannya,” kata Anwar ketika memberi keterangan dari saksi tertuduh di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur.

Anwar juga berkata, mengikut keterangan pengadu dia tiba di Kondominium Desa Damansara pada pukul 2.45 petang, 28 Julai 2008 untuk membincangkan perkara berkaitan kerja.

Beliau menambah, pada peringkat itu, Saiful sepatutnya telah melarikan diri, namun tidak berbuat demikian atas alasan takut.

“Dia tidak berbuat demikian. Keterangan lain berhubung perkara ini dengan jelas menunjukkan bahawa pengadu mempunyai segala peluang untuk keluar (dari kondominimum), tetapi dia tidak melakukannya,” kata beliau lagi.

Menurut Anwar alasan Saiful bahawa dia diselubungi ketakutan adalah bercanggah dengan fakta kes tersebut, Anwar seterusnya berkata ketika disoal balas, Saiful mengakui bahawa dia telah membeli bahan pelincir dan secara sukarela telah mengenakannya serta mendakwa hubungan seks telah berlaku dan ia “sesuatu yang menyakitkan.”

“Bagaimanapun, sangat jelas tiada bukti perubatan wujudnya kesan penembusan atau koyakan. Selepas hubungan (seks) yang didakwa berlaku, dia minum dan berbual mesra dengan saya.

“Pengadu tidak cuba mendapatkan pemeriksaan perubatan dengan segera. Sebaliknya, dia menghadiri satu majlis PKR pada keesokan hari,” kata Anwar.

“Pada sebelah petang, dia mengambil bahagian dalam satu mesyuarat Kelab Anwar Ibrahim di rumah saya tanpa menunjukkan sebarang tanda emosi atau ketidakselesaan fizikal, malah trauma,” kata Anwar lagi.

“Sikapnya seara total tidak konsisten dengan dakwaan bahawa dia telah dikasari,” tambah beliau.

Anwar juga berkata, Saiful tidak terus membuat laporan polis dan membuat laporan perubatan dengan segera, sebaliknya mengadakan pertemuan dengan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak dan isterinya Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.

Selain itu, Saiful juga dengan Tan Sri Musa Hassan, Ketua Polis Negara ketika itu dan mengadakan pertemuan dengan Datuk Mohd Rodhwan Mohd Yusof, bekas ketua polis Melaka, di sebuah hotel dua hari sebelum kejadian didakwa berlaku.

Najib merupakan timbalan perdana menteri ketika itu.

“Oleh itu adalah jelas daripada bukti itu bahawa pengadu telah berbohong meskipun Yang Arif (Hakim) memutuskan bahawa dia seorang saksi yang benar,” katanya.

The Datuk "T" Trio to be charged on Fridau, 24th Jun 2011

As reported by the Star Online on Wednesday 22nd June 2011

The three members of Datuk T' who admitted to showing a sex video implicating an opposition leader to editors and journalists at Carcosa Seri Negara will be charged at a Kuala Lumpur court on Froday June 24, 2011.

Datuk T, comprising businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah, former Malacca Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik and former Perkasa treasurer-general Datuk Shuib Lazim would be charged under Section 5 of the Film Censorship Act.

If found guilty, they are liable to a fine of RM10,000 or jailed five years or both.

The matter is brought to court following police investigation into a report lodged by Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who had claimed that he was not the man in the video.

“Let the law takes its course, and hopefully the truth will be revealed,” said Eskay.

Shuib, who was discharged from the hospital on Tuesday, 21st Jun 2011 said the public deserve to know the truth.

“We leave it to the court to decide, but our conscience is clear as we exposed the existence of the video in the interest of the nation,” he said.

The police had sought the help of local and foreign experts to verify the identity of the man in the video.

Rahim said the police have already verified the authenticity of the video and the identity of the man in the video.

“The finding should be revealed in the interest of the public,” he said.

A Prince gets married, The bad guy is dead and the Actor denies > what an eventful week in the world

People wrote on Twitter, what an eventful week it was starting 29 April to 2nd May 2011.



First a Prince gets married. Prince William marries Kate Middleton on 29th April 2011 at the Westminster Abbey, London.




Secondly the bad guy is dead. 3 days after Prince William got married, the world's most wanted terrorist, Osama bin Laden was shot dead by elite Navy SEAL Team 6 counter-terrorism unit commandos in a firefight in Abbottabad, Pakistan on 2nd May 2011.




And on the same day Prince William got married, a shy Actor keeps denying he is the man secretly filmed in action with a Chinese Actress in an undirected and uncensored steamy blockbuster Hollywood-style movie..> It's a real Disney weekend here on earth!!

Malaysia's opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim said repeatedly that he is not the man depicted in the steamy video, first surfaced on 21st March 2011.

Anwar Ibrahim vehemently denies he is the man in latest sex video

Update : April 5th, 2011

A clip from a sex tape said to feature Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has been posted on video-sharing website YouTube, on Monday evening 4th April 2011.

The one minute and 47 second excerpt uploaded on Sunday, 3rd April 2011 is not explicit in itself but is part of a longer video showing a man having sex with a woman in a hotel room, local media have reported.

The man in the YouTube clip is said to closely resemble Anwar, although the former deputy premier vehemently denied any involvement in many press conferences and media interviews.





YouTube removed the clip late Monday, 4th April 2011 but by then it had spread to pro-government blogs and websites, according to the Star daily newspaper.



A notice on YouTube at about 11.35pm Monday, 4th April 2011 stated that the video “was removed as a violation of YouTube's policy on nudity or sexual content”.

The Star said the YouTube clip showed a man in a towel with another man dressed in a shirt and trousers while a woman with Chinese features is seen sitting on a bed.

In the longer video, the man in the towel reportedly has sex with the woman after the other man leaves the room.

You can judge for yourself, is this Anwar Ibrahim or someone else, resembling him :



If that is really Anwar, then we can say that he is not Gay, but Bisexual!!

And if that is not Anwar, we can say that this video is doctored and fake!! End of Story.

"The face of the towel-clad, pudgy-looking man in short hair can be seen several times. He, however, does not stand in place long enough for his face to be clearly identified," the Star reported.

Anwar told online news portal Malaysiakini that it he was not the man in the video.

"Now, the video has been distributed. And whether the person looks like me or not, I don't care. It wasn't me," he was quoted as saying by the website.

Three men have claimed they obtained the tape, but two of them said they handed it over to police and were not responsible for the clip posted on YouTube, according to Malaysiakini.

The three men calls themselves Datuk T or Datuk Trio comprising former Malacca chief minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik, businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah and Perkasa treasurer Datuk Shuaib Lazim.

The three have claimed that the incident took place at a hotel "that offered sex services and spa facilities" in the Malaysian capital on February 21, 2011 but a subtitle in Thai gives a Bangkok address.

Eskay admitted to the media then that he was also in the video.

Police spokesmen were unavailable for comment on how the most sought after video made it to Youtube.

Last week, Malaysian police chief Ismail Omar said experts had decided the tape was genuine and not doctored and a police investigation was in its closing stages.

Meanwhile Anwar Ibrahim's wife who is also PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail has insisted that the man in the sex video is not her husband.

Speaking at a press conference at her residence in Segambut Dalam, on Tuesday 5th April 2011, she said she had watched the short video clip posted on Youtube on Monday, 4th April 2011 with her family.

“It is not him. It is clear that the body and physique of the actor' in the video is extremely different from that of Anwar.

“This is strengthened by the fact that for over a year now he has been accompanied by his children whenever he exercises and undergoes physiotherapy as part of the recuperative measures for his injured spine,” she told a packed press conference.



Anwar Ibrahim, 63, was the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia between 1993 to 1998 when he was sacked by then Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad over alleged sexual misconduct.

He was jailed in 1998 on separate sodomy and corruption charges but was released from jail in 2004 after the sodomy conviction was overturned.

Anwar is currently on trial for another sodomy charge, this time a 25-year-old male and former aide, Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan has accused Anwar of sodomising him at an upmarket Kuala Lumpur condominium in 2008. If convicted, Anwar faces up to 20 years in prison.

Anwar has said he is the victim of a plot to prevent him from taking power after the opposition made huge strides in 2008 elections, stunning the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition which has been in power for half a century.

Now, Anwar faces another sensational accusation that he is the man in a fresh and latest sex video, revealed to Malaysian journalists earlier today, Monday 21st March 2011.

The alleged incident took place at a hotel "that offered sex services and spa facilities" in the Malaysian capital on February 21 this year.

Anwar said that the sex video was just the latest attack by his political enemies ahead of the Sarawak polls expected some time in April.

Sarawak’s state assembly was coincidently dissolved today, Monday, 21st March 2011, the same date where the latest sex tape emerged and the Election Commission will meet Wednesday, 23rd March 2011 to decide on the polling day.

The story in full : As reported by the Star Online - Malaysia's top English language newspaper on Monday, 21st March 2011



Malaysian Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim denied on Monday, 21st March 2011 that he was the man in the February 21, sex video revealed to journalists earlier today.

“I sternly deny this scurrilous attack.”

He said that he was at home with Parti Keadilan Rakyat staff, his wife, children, grandchildren and tweeting on that day and at that time.

The sex video’s time stamp on February 21, was from 10.23pm to 10.45pm.

Anwar said that he was told that man in the sex video looked very much like him except his stomach was bigger (perut buncit).


He stood up and quipped: “See, I’m slimmer.”

He described the video “as a good but not a perfect job.”

Anwar was speaking at a packed press conference flanked by his wife Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and other top party leaders.

On a more serious note, he said that the sex video was just the latest attack by his political enemies ahead of the Sarawak polls expected some time in April.

Sarawak’s state assembly was dissolved Monday, 21st March 2011, and the Election Commission will meet Wednesday, 23rd March 2011 to decide on the polling day.

Earlier Monday, newsmen were shown a 22-minute video, showing a man resembling Anwar having sex with a woman, by a man who identified himself only as Datuk T. He claimed the video was recorded on Feb 21 in a local hotel room.

In the video, when the man leaves the room briefly, the woman rummages through his things and takes a watch.

Datuk T showed an Omega watch to journalists when he held the screening of the sex video earlier Monday and claimed that the watch was Anwar’s.

Asked about the watch, Anwar confirmed he owned an Omega watch and that the watch was with his wife.

He also said he did not know who Datuk T was.

“I call on the parties (behind this sex video) to stop dragging the public and country into dirty and obscene politics,” he said.

“It is a desperate act and the timing is perfect.

“Everytime we face elections – in 1999, 2004 and 2008 and now again.”

“Our members and supporters will not be generally duped into believing these claims,” he said.

Asked if he intended to make a police report, he said: “ I don’t know. I have not seen it (video). I have been advised by my lawyers that once we have found evidence, we can lodge a police report.”

Datuk T had said that he wanted the man in the video and his wife to step down within a week or he would make the video public through certain NGOs.

Dr Wan Azizah said: “I was surprised he (Datuk T) asked me step down. What have I done?

“These attacks are not new. It is politically motivated and irresponsible.”

Even before the press conference at 5.30pm, PKR leaders had come to Anwar's defence.

“This is a doctored video of Anwar,” alleged PKR communications director Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad in his tweet.

PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution challenged the mysterious Datuk T to reveal himself before making accusations against Anwar.

“Who is this Datuk T? We cannot just respond to any Tom, Dick or Harry. He is brave enough to challenge Anwar, but does not dare to expose himself. There needs to be some credibility,” Saifuddin said when contacted.

He said the entire exercise was a sign of Umno’s and Barisan Nasional’s desperation in their bid to demolish Anwar.

“This has been part of a failed smear campaign for the past 12 years.

"This was also timed to divert attention away from issues of corruption and scandal in Sarawak,” he said adding he was confident the party would pass this ‘test’ because of his firm belief that Anwar had been made a victim.

PKR’s Batu MP Tian Chua, in his tweet, described the “special viewing of a doctored video of Anwar Ibrahim” to the media as a desperate tactic by Barisan Nasional to distract the debate from policies and governance ahead of the Sarawak polls.

“(Barisan) shifted to focus on smearing and character assassination. The whole purpose of the exercise is to smear (Anwar’s name).

"The people who presented the video viewing in Carcosa this morning won’t even reveal their identities,” he said.

Tian Chua said he expected the mainstream media to play the story “to the extreme”.

Earlier story by the Star on the sex video

Top 'Opposition leader' caught on sex video

PETALING JAYA 21st March 2011 : A video showing a man, resembling a top Opposition leader having sex with a woman, believed to be a foreign prostitute, has emerged.

The 30-minute video, which showed the supposedly high profile Member of Parliament in various compromising positions, is set to rock the Malaysian political arena.

The video recorded on Feb 21 was found in a hotel room in Kuala Lumpur.

Press representatives were taken to a hotel room individually to view the video footage by a group of unknown people led by a person, who only wanted to be known as Datuk T.

Datuk T said he wanted the media to watch the footage showing the politician before sending the copy to him and his wife “to identify the person in the video” a week from now.

He said if the individual in the video was the politician he had identified to the media, "then he and his wife must step down from politics.”

Datuk T said he was not “the pious person with high moral values and integrity as portrayed, and therefore is not fit to be leader.”

Datuk T said if the two did not quit politics, “I will call on several NGOs (non-government organisations) to set up an independent panel to investigate and seek professional forensic services to study the authenticity of the recordings.”

Datuk T claimed he had stumbled upon the video after he was asked by the politician to search for his watch in the room where the sexual encounter had taken place.

“As I could not find the watch on the table, I searched for it behind the dresser. I was shocked to find many strands of wires behind the dresser.

“On close inspection, I found four well-hidden CCTV cameras, I tried to open the two dresser drawers and found one was locked.

“I prised open the locked drawer using a sharp object. I found an active CCTV recorder. I disconnected the wiring and took the recorder out of the hotel,’’ he said, adding that no one had the recording except him.

“I will not hand over copies to any quarters for fear of reproduction and distribution,’’ he said.

Members of the media including The Star viewed the video clip on a computer at the hotel room, where Datuk T was heavily guarded. The Star journalist was searched and had his mobile phone taken away before being allowed to view the video. The other members of the media included those from Bernama, New Straits Times, Utusan Malaysia, China Press, the Internet portals, foreign news agencies and at least one opposition organ.

The video clip had sharp images and the woman appeared to be a fair-skinned foreigner, possibly an East Asian.

Meanwhile AFP reported that according to online news portal journalist Sam Tan, who was allowed to view the 17-minute tape, it showed someone looking like the former deputy premier engaging in sex with a woman in what appeared to be a hotel room.

"The people involved showed us the video on a laptop and it appeared to be from a CCTV that showed someone who looks like Anwar having sex with a woman," he said.

"The reporters were made to leave their cameras and all recording devices outside the room before we were made to dress in robes and led to the computer where the video was played for us," he added.

Meanwhile, with talk of the video having surfaced, PKR communications director Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad tweeted, saying the video was doctored.

Men stop Anwar Ibrahim’s former assistant from talking to media

Source The Star Online

Is the Parti Keadilan Rakyat, PKR, one of the main opposition parties in Malaysia - using gangster tactis against whoever they considered their foes??

Well in Klang, Selangor on 6th October 2010, The Star reported that groups of men stormed a restaurant and stopped a former aide of PKR leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim from talking to the press.

The men, believed to be PKR members, hurled obscenities at both Rahimi Osman and his lawyer S. Ravi Chandran and demanded that they leave the premises without speaking to the media.

However, it is believed that Rahimi, who was Anwar’s aide in 2008, had lodged a police report at the Klang district police headquarters before going to the restaurant for the press conference scheduled at 4pm yesterday.

It was learnt that Rahimi had stated in the report that he was forced to sign two statutory declarations in 2008 implicating Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and his wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor in the sodomy case involving his friend Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who is also Anwar’s former aide.

According to the report, Rahimi alleged that he was forced to sign the statutory declaration by several PKR members, including party information chief Latheefa Koya.

He claimed that he was also forced to remain in a hotel in Shah Alam for a few days after signing the statutory declarations, which he had done under duress and for fear for his safety.

It is believed that he had made a new statutory declaration yesterday to debunk his earlier two declarations. Klang OCPD ACP Mohamad Mat Yusop confirmed that Rahimi had lodged a report at the Klang police station.

Anwar’s aide in charge of Indian affairs K. Suresh Kumar, who was at the restaurant, accused Rahimi of trying to create chaos at a time when the PKR polls for the top posts were around the corner, and that he had been “paid” to make his allegations.

“What is he up to? He disappeared when Mohd Saiful accused Datuk Seri (Anwar). I called him and he told me then that he wanted to remain neutral,” said Suresh Kumar.

The group later gathered at another restaurant in Petaling Jaya after hearing rumours that Rahimi would be giving another press conference but left when he did not show up.

Latheefa, meanwhile, denied using any form of duress on Rahimi.

“He was at that time a potential witness in the sodomy case and as part of the defence team, we were merely preparing statements for potential witnesses, which is the norm in any legal defence,” she said.

She added that Rahimi had voluntarily cooperated at all times, adding that it was absurd for him to claim duress two years after making statutory declarations that were never used.

Hmmmm.... what's your say???

Anwar Ibrahim sodomy trial : Saiful Bukhari tells court he did not wash his anus for two days

The sodomy trial of former Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister and Opposition leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim revealed many intimate details about the alleged sodomy.

In the court proceeding today, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan said he did not wash his anus for two days after he was allegedly sodomised by Datuk Seri Anwar as he wanted to keep the evidence intact, the High Court here heard.

Mohd Saiful, 25, admitted that he did not take his bath after he was allegedly sodomised by Anwar on June 26, 2008.

Questioned by Anwar's lead counsel Karpal Singh, he said he had a complete bath in the morning of June 26 and merely “rinsed” (bilas) after the alleged sodomy.

He added that he did not take a bath and did not wash his anus after the allegedly incident as he wanted to keep the evidence intact.

On why did not lodge a police report after the alleged incident, he said he wanted to seek advice from several people before doing so.

“I want to get advice as it involved my dignity,” said Mohd Saiful, who is the first prosecution witness in the high profile sodomy trial Thursday.

In elaborating, Mohd Saiful said he wanted advice from his uncle Tuah Mohd Halim, his friend Rahimi Osman, former PKR Youth chief Ezam Mohd Noor, one Datuk Mumtaz (Jaafar) and a religious teacher.

When asked why he did not go to the police station and give an immediate statement, he did not reply.

However, Mohd Saiful agreed with Karpal's suggestion that he did not use the opportunity to lodge a police report for two days after the incident.

Mohd Saiful said he lodged a police report on June 28, 2008.

Mohd Saiful agreed that he gave an interview to Malaysiakini which was published online on Aug 15, 2008.

When showed a printout of the online report, Mohd Saiful asked to observe the publication for many times and then replied that he had indeed told the reporter that he was sodomised by Anwar for the first time.

However, he maintained that he had misinterpreted the question.

He agreed that he did not take steps to rectify the mistake in the online report as he did not read it or overlooked the matter.

At this juncture, Karpal cautioned him that he could be jailed if he is found to have given false evidence and later when asked if the rest of the report was accurate, Mohd Saiful said: “I cannot confirm it 100 per cent that this was correct,” he said.

When asked if he had lied in court when he testified that he had met then Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at his residence on June 24, 2008 to complain that he had been sodomised by Anwar many times, he disagreed.

Asked if he was a strong supporter of Umno, he said “ I support Barisan Nasional but my vote was for R. Sivarasa and Elizabeth Wong” in the last general election.

Upon hearing this, Karpal suggested that Mohd Saiful is a traitor but he replied that it is a free country.

He disagreed to another suggestion that the sodomy incident was planned by him with the assistance of the police and Najib.

He admitted that he told a senior police officer - ACP Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof (now SAC I/Datuk) - that he had been sodomised by Anwar several times in the country and abroad.

On the delay in reaching a condominium to see Anwar on June 26, Mohd Saiful said it was because he saw a motorcycle following him and he tried to evade it.

Earlier, High Court judge Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah dismissed an application by the defence for a stay of proceedings pending appeal over the dismissal of getting the prosecution to supply Mohd Saiful's written statements.

Justice Mohamad Zabidin ruled that there was no special circumstances to warrant a stay.

The judge said it (the dismissal over the supply of written statements) was a procedural ruling and that it was not appealable. The sodomy trial continued in-camera at 2.15pm.

Anwar Ibrahim kalah berdebat di Parlimen??

Laporan Utusan Malaysia pada 22 Oktober 2009 menyebut seperti berikut :

Jawapan Mohd. Nor buatkan Anwar terdiam

KUALA LUMPUR 22 Okt. – Jika perbahasan Sidang Dewan Rakyat diibaratkan satu pertandingan debat, Mohd. Nor Othman (BN-Hulu Terengganu) umumnya bukanlah tandingan kepada Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Namun demikian, pada perbahasan Rang Undang-Undang Panglima Gagah Berani hari ini, Mohd. Nor walaupun sekali-sekala masih kedengaran loghat Terengganu dalam ucapannya berjaya membuktikan sebaliknya.

Ini berikutan jawapan beliau terhadap celahan Anwar ibarat ‘pukulan maut’ yang mematikan terus hujah Ketua Pembangkang yang umumnya dikenali sebagai seorang yang petah berpidato.

Anwar dalam celahan itu antaranya seperti mendabik dada apabila mendakwa banyak peruntukan bagi kebajikan untuk anggota keselamatan dilakukan sewaktu beliau berada di dalam kerajaan.

“Sama ada Yang Berhormat (Hulu Terengganu) sedar atau tidak, dalam seluruh sejarah, peruntukan terbesar kepada pegawai dan anggota tentera terutama sudut perumahan adalah diluluskan semasa saya memegang jawatan Menteri Kewangan,” jelas Anwar.

Mendengar celahan Anwar itu, Mohd. Nor hanya berkata:

“Ya kita berterima kasih kerana Ketua Pembangkang telah sediakan jumlah banyak untuk perumahan anggota tentera dan polis (ketika jadi Menteri Kewangan) dahulu.

“Tetapi ingatlah, pada masa itu Ketua Pembangkang boleh melaksanakannya kerana Ketua Pembangkang berada dalam kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN). Kalau di luar kerajaan BN, belum tentu (Ketua Pembangkang) boleh berbuat seperti itu,” katanya.

Jawapan Mohd. Nor itu kemudiannya langsung tidak cuba dipatahkan Anwar yang sebelum itu mengambil masa hampir lima minit ketika mencelah giliran Mohd. Nor berbahas Rang Undang-Undang Panglima Gagah Berani bagi menaikkan elaun penerimanya daripada RM300 kepada RM500.

Selain itu, Mohd. Nor dalam perbahasannya turut membidas beberapa hujah daripada wakil pembangkang yang mengambil giliran sebelum beliau.

Apa yang menarik, wakil Hulu Terengganu itu dengan gaya bersahaja menggunakan bidalan membidas pembangkang yang sebelum itu mendakwa mereka akan memperjuangkan kebajikan anggota tentera jika menjadi kerajaan berbanding kerajaan BN yang mengabaikan kebajikan pasukan keselamatan.

Menurut Mohd. Nor, sekiranya benar pembangkang begitu prihatin kepada kebajikan anggota tentera mengapa tidak kerajaan negeri pimpinan pembangkang yang ada pada hari ini turut sama melakukan sesuatu untuk tujuan tersebut.

“Kepada wakil Gombak, (Mohamed Azmin Ali-PKR), kami menunggu janji manis kata-kata berhikmah supaya peruntukan yang sama turut diberikan oleh kerajaan pembangkang.

“Ini supaya buah terus digugur, jangan cakap tak serupa bikin. Cakap berderai-derai, tapi ekor bergelumang najis,” ujarnya.

Setelah lebih sepuluh anggota Dewan terlibat dalam perbahasan tersebut, Rang Undang-Undang Panglima Gagah Berani (Elaun Kenangan) 2009 bagi menaikkan elaun penerima pingat tersebut daripada RM300 kepada RM1,500 diluluskan.

Ends.

Namun ada satu lagi cerita mengenai Anwar Ibrahim - dulu dia selalu hentam media arus perdana seperti TV3, Berita Harian, Utusan Malaysia, RTM, The Star kerana selalu menyebelahi BN dan sering menghentam pembangkang dan beliau... Anwar melabelkan media arus perdana itu dengan pelbagai label yang negatif!!!

Tapi cuba katakan pada Anwar - siapakah yang membantu Anwar Ibrahim menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri dulu setelah beliau menang jawatan Timbalan Presiden UMNO dengan menewaskan Allahyarham Tun Ghafar Baba pada 1993?? Siapa??

Jawapannya Media arus perdanalah yg menaikkan beliau - media arus perdana seperti Berita Harian, Utusan Malaysia, TV3, RTM dan The Star lah yang mengikut dia ke hulu ke hilir, siang malam, buat liputan kempen ceramah dia menentang Tun Ghafar - semua media arus perdana ikut dia... dan semua ini disiarkan di berita perdana jam 8 pm dan muka hadapan surat2 khabar perdana...

Sedikit saja media yg sokong Tun Ghafar meskipun ketika itu Tun Ghafar adalah Timbalan Perdana Menteri merangkap incumbent/penyokong Timbalan Presiden UMNO.

Kesudahannya, 19 daripada 20 Bahagian UMNO di Sabah, mencalonkan Anwar bagi jawatan Timbalan Presiden UMNO, hanya 1 Bahagian sahaja iaitu Marudu yg diketuai Allahyarham Tun Mustafa Datu Harun yg mencalonkan Tun Ghafar. Keadaan itu amat merungsingkan Ghafar kerana ketika itu dia adalah Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan UMNO Sabah - tetapi kepimpinannya ditolak oleh UMNO Sabah sendiri...

Ini memaksa Tun Ghafar meletakkan jawatan sebagai Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan UMNO Sabah... dan tidak lama selepas itu Tun Ghafar mengumumkan perletakan jawatannya sebagai Timbalan Presiden UMNO.

Ini kerana selain di Sabah, pencalonan diterima Anwar di seluruh negara jauh meninggalkan pencalonan diterima Tun Ghafar, sehinggalah memaksa Tun Ghafar meletakkan jawatan Timbalan Presiden UMNO dan Timbalan Perdana Menteri.

Kesudahannya, Anwar Ibrahim menang tanpa bertanding jawatan Timbalan Presiden UMNO - menerusi bantuan Media arus perdana... tetapi setelah dia dipecat dari UMNO pada 1998, Anwar melabelkan pula media arus perdana dengan pelbagai label negatif....!!!

Anwar Ibrahim letter of demand to Utusan Malaysia

source : http://anwaribrahimblog.com

By Anwar Ibrahim

Letter of Demand to The Managing Director of Utusan Malaysia Berhad

Your Ref:
Our Ref:
Date: 3rd August 2009

The Managing Director
Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Berhad
46M, Jalan Lima Off Jalan Chan Sow Lin
55200 Kuala Lumpur

Sir,

RE: Libelous Statement

We act for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who is the Former Deputy Prime Minister and is presently the Leader of the Opposition in the Malaysian Parliament.

We are instructed that on or about 3rd August 2009, you published or caused to be published the following words that were uttered by Y.A.B Tan Sri Dato’ Haji Muhyiddin Bin Mohd. Yassin that was published in the Utusan Malaysia newspaper under the caption:

“Anwar Pengkhianat, Putar belit fakta mengenai usaha martabatkan Melayu – Muhyiddin”

Oleh Sahbullah Darwi
Batu Pahat 2 Ogos – Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin menyifatkan Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sebagai pengkhianat besar terhadap perjuangan orang melayu.

Timbalan Perdana Menteri turut menyifatkan Anwar sebagai pemimpin lidah bercabang kerana sanggup memutarbelitkan fakta mengenai usaha UMNO untuk memartabatkan orang Melayu.

“Dulu dia pernah menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Timbalan Presiden UMNO seperti saya sekarang, tetapi dia sekarang menggunakan cara yang memperdayakan untuk memusnahkan perjuangan kita,” katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian ketika merasmikan Persidangan Perwakilan UMNO Bahagian Sri Gading di Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) di sini semalam.

Muhyiddin berkata, Anwar selaku Ketua Pembangkang kini menyebarkan dakyah untuk mencipta persepsi negatif terhadap usaha UMNO dalam mempertahankan hak keistimewaan Melayu dan institusi raja.

“Dia kata kepada semua orang bahawa UMNO zalim, tetapi beritahu saya sekarang dalam cara apa yang kita zalim? Kenapa dia tidak beritahu ini semasa dia jadi pemimpin kita?” soalnya.

Beliau mendedahkan taktik pembangkang mengulangi pembohongan sehingga rakyat mempercayai penipuan itu.

“Hingga sampai ke tahap ini, orang menganggap apa yang dilakukan oleh UMNO adalah salah dan apa sahaja yang dilakukan kita tidak baik untuk rakyat.

“Maka semua kebaikan yang dpernah kita lakukan membangunkan negara sejak 50 tahun lalu tidak lagi dihargai,” katanya.

Muhyiddin mengakui UMNO bukanlah parti yang tidak pernah melakukan kesilapan namun ia telah melakukan yang terbaik untuk menghapuskan rasuah, keangkuhan dan pengurusan yang tidak cekap.

“Tiada masalah untuk mengkritik kerana kita bukan maksum tetapi saya tidak boleh terima kalau pembangkang menghina dan tidak menghormati orang Melayu,” jelasnya.

Sehubungan itu, beliau menyeru ahli dan pemimpin UMNO mengubah persepsi negatif pembangkang terhadap parti dengan terus mendekati rakyat terutama di peringkat akar umbi.

Menurutnya, pendekatan itu jika dilakukan secara berterusan akan menyedarkan rakyat terhadap perjuangan ikhlas UMNO dalam membela nasib mereka terutama bangsa Melayu.

“Kita hanya mempunyai dua tahun untuk mengubah persepsi dan imej buruk itu,” katanya.

Menurutnya, UMNO juga bukan parti yang semata-mata mahukan undi rakyat pada setiap pilihan raya, tetapi untuk membela dan membangunkan mereka.

“Tetapi disebabkan dakyah serta pelbagai tuduhan pembangkang terhadap UMNO menyebabkan timbul persepsi buruk rakyat terhadap parti sejak kebelakangan ini,” katanya.

Ekoran itu, beliau berkata, tindakan segera perlu dilaksanakan mulai sekarang bagi mengembalikan semula keyakinan tersebut agar UMNO dapat terus berjuang untuk membela mereka. (hereinafter called “the Impugned Article”).

Inter alia, the Impugned Article contained the following defamatory words published and or quoted by you about our client:

i) Batu Pahat 2 Ogos – Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin menyifatkan Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sebagai pengkhianat besar terhadap perjuangan orang melayu.

ii) Timbalan Perdana Menteri turut menyifatkan Anwar sebagai pemimpin lidah bercabang kerana sanggup memutarbelitkan fakta mengenai usaha UMNO untuk memartabatkan orang Melayu.

iii) “Dulu dia pernah menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Timbalan Presiden UMNO seperti saya sekarang, tetapi dia sekarang menggunakan cara yang memperdayakan untuk memusnahkan perjuangan kita,” katanya.

iv) Muhyiddin berkata, Anwar selaku Ketua Pembangkang kini menyebarkan dakyah untuk mencipta persepsi negatif terhadap usaha UMNO dalam mempertahankan hak keistimewaan Melayu dan institusi raja.

v) Beliau mendedahkan taktik pembangkang mengulangi pembohongan sehingga rakyat mempercayai penipuan itu.

vi) “Tiada masalah untuk mengkritik kerana kita bukan maksum tetapi saya tidak boleh terima kalau pembangkang menghina dan tidak menghormati orang Melayu,” jelasnya.

vii) “Tetapi disebabkan dakyah serta pelbagai tuduhan pembangkang terhadap UMNO menyebabkan timbul persepsi buruk rakyat terhadap parti sejak kebelakangan ini,” katanya.

The Impugned Article and the Impugned Words were and are defamatory and or libelous of our Client and in their natural and ordinary meaning and or by implication mean, meant and were understood to, inter alia, mean that:

i) Our client is a dishonest person both in his private and official capacity;
ii) Our Client is a liar;
iii) Our Client is an untrustworthy person as well as an unfit politician;
iv) Our Client is a traitor to the Malays;
v) Our Client is unfit to hold public office;
vi) Our Client is unprincipled and corrupt;
vii) Our Client has committed a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment; and
viii) Our Client is unethical.

By innuendo, the Impugned Article and the Impugned Words were and are defamatory and or libelous of our Client and in their natural and ordinary meaning and or by implication mean, meant and were understood to, inter alia, mean that:

i) Our client is a dishonest person both in his private and official capacity;
ii) Our Client is a liar;
iii) Our Client is an untrustworthy person as well as an unfit politician;
iv) Our Client is a traitor to the Malays;
v) Our Client is unfit to hold public office;
vi) Our Client is unprincipled and corrupt;
vii) Our Client has committed a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment; and
viii) Our Client is unethical.

Inter alia, our client contends the following in that, the Impugned Article and the Impugned Words published by you in respect of our client:-

a) are bereft of truth, vexatious, specious, fallacious and wholly uncalled for;
b) are and were grossly negligent, reckless, deliberate, malicious and aimed to lower our client’s esteem in the eyes of the public, both locally and internationally , and expose our client to public hatred, scorn, odium, opprobrium, contempt and ridicule;
c) are wholly untrue, motivated by malice, mala fides, distortion of facts suggesting moral and legal impropriety on the part of our client and are principally done in your pursuit of seeking cheap publicity/ sensationalism for political and other purposes; and
d) are pre-mediated and calculated to tarnish, malign, defame and seriously injure the good name and character of our client.

We are further instructed that you have republished or caused it to be republished the abovementioned Impugned Article and Impugned Words and the libelous comments.

The Impugned Words uttered and published by you in respect of our client and the comments against our client by you, amounts to a very serious libel on our client and have caused our client considerable distress and embarrassment. These Impugned Words published by you in respect of our client and comments made against our client are false, malicious and your attack on our client is wholly unjustified.

We are therefore instructed to demand from you, which we hereby do:

1) An immediate and unequivocal public retraction of the Impugned Article and the Impugned Words and the removal and retraction of all the offending and defamatory comments, forthwith;
2) An apology in the terms to be approved by us as solicitors, to be published in newspapers or media of our client’s choice;
3) An undertaking by you not to repeat the above allegations and comments as per the Impugned Words or the likes of the same;

Our client has also has instructed us to demand damages of RM100 million (Ringgit Malaysia One Hundred Million) from you for the injury caused to our client’s reputation.

Our client has also requested us to demand payment of all legal costs that has been incurred with regard to this matter.

This letter is written in accordance with pre-action protocol prior to the institution of a libel action. We look forward to hearing from you without delay. If we do not receive a satisfactory reply within seven (7) days of the receipt of this letter, our instructions are to institute legal proceedings against you. In the meantime, our client reserves all our client’s rights in this matter.

Please acknowledge receipt accordingly.

Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
S.N. NAIR & PARTNERS

c.c client.